Saturday, February 27, 2010



Both men probably felt the need to prove to others that they were not gay. Both actors we able to show very intense emotions for each other on the screen. It is inevitable that some people would question their sexuality due to the effective manor in which they portrayed 2 gay men. It is also possible that they needed to prove to themselves that they were not homosexuals. By throwing themselves into the characters, they may have begun to question themselves. The affair with Ledgers' co-star and Jakes' masculine war movie could have been used to ease their fears of homosexuality. Both men have a much larger audience to prove their masculinity to, so any accusation of homosexuality would strike at them harder. Both men needed to protect their careers as well. They did not want Brokeback to set the rest of their roles. Elijah Wood will never shake being Frodo Baggins. This identification could destroy Woods career. Perhaps Jake and Heath were afraid that this film would lock them into certain parts.

I do not believe they were uncomfortable playing gay characters. If they were, they would not have done such an amazing job. Both men have to deal with tabloids, news casts, and an audience as a whole. This added pressure is going to cause behavior that is unusual to a public that never is under such a magnifying glass. By playing gay men in such a convincing manor could cause people to think they are gay. It would make sense that they would try to prevent a view of them that is not true. The fact that they filmed masculine movies on the side could have been nothing more than their agents looking out for their careers.

Friday, February 26, 2010


I find it interesting that the two actors received so much questioning on their sexuality because of this movie. As we discussed in class, though, the dominant culture rules society. Because of this fact, the films which the actors played straight men were overlooked. Filmed at the same time, Heath Ledger starred in Casanova, in which he played a man notoriously promiscuous with women. Jake Gyllenhall simultaneously stars in Jarhead, a military story. The three films contrast so greatly that I cannot imagine how critics automatically jump to conclusions that they would be gay. Why can't we just simply recognize talent when it's put in front of us? The comfort that Jake and Heath showed the film world is a statement to their character and professionalism as actors, as well as their security as men. They were able to recognize that the story wasn't merely a "gay cowboy movie" as it had been labeled even before screening, but a message with deeper meaning. Actors such as Matt Damon turned down the role because of the inherent risk that was involved. The actors received the acclaim they deserved after the movie was released, but not without questioning as well. Ang Lee, the director, also demonstrated an act of faith as well when he decided to take on the film. It’s, simply stated, a beautiful film. Granted, it’s not a subject or a storyline everyone is comfortable with. But if you’re willing to give it the opportunity to win you over, you'll find “Brokeback Mountain” to be an absorbing, heart-wrenching, romantic tale.

Brokeback Mountain

It is clear that both Ledger and Gyllenhaal were both pretty assertive about making it clear that they were not actually gay. While I think that this is a little more conspicuous-those who are quick to deny something often seem more guilty-I do not think it so wrong that they did this and I understand where they are coming from.
I think the issue in this particular case was not so much about homophobia on their part as much as it was about keeping an image that they had both worked hard for. Being a famous actor these days is all about image. Both Ledger and Gyllenhaal had reached a point when they made this movie where they were frequently in the news. Thus it is vital for their career that they both maintain an image that is good. This is not to say that being seen as gay is wrong, their are many gay actors who are very appreciated. The issue here is that both Ledger and Gyllenhaal are most likely not gay, and thus they do not want anybody thinking that they are. i do not think an openly gay man would have people believe that they are straight, especially not other potential gay partners.
Gyllenhaal and Ledger were seen somewhat as sex symbols. Not as much as some more famous actors, but they were definitely good looking to most women in America. So I think they just didn't want to loose that appeal.
I may just be easily fooled by movies, but I don't see how two actors who could play gay roles that realistically and that passionately could really be uncomfortable with homosexuality.

Clockwork Orange

While being pretty controversial, and certainly very racy for a classroom, A Clockwork Orange is a very fine movie that digs deep into society. It is set in the near future, in a culture that looks different than ours but feels very much the same. It explores the issues of violence in society, the correctional system, and the nature of politics.
The whole plot of the movie is based on a man who commits unspeakable, violent, crude acts for the sheer pleasure of it. This is a clever way to look at violence at large, as that is how so many people see it. They see it as being perpetrated by evil men who have no soul.
It goes into great exploration of the jail and rehabilitation systems in today's culture. It deals with the idea of punishment vs. rehabilitation. The main character is first sent to prison, and somehow we feel sorry for him, and then he is brainwashed into being a good citizen, which is clearly wrong from the viewers perspective.
The film also deals with politics in that it pokes fun at how political parties do anything to get win the public's favor. In the end of the movie, the main character is put back to normal and freed to do all the horrible things he loves. And this happens so that the governor will be seen as a good man.
All in all it is a great movie. Not only does it offer loads of discussion but it is very enjoyable to watch. Directed by one of the best of all time, Stanley Kubrick, it is a must see for any one interested in both politics, society, and film.

Whiteness

Whiteness is a difficult subject for me to talk about. For one thing, it is always tempting to just say that I see whiteness as no different from other ethnicities, as we are all the same. But of course this is just playing innocent. The fact is that I am aware of the fact that I am white very much, and I'm not quite sure how to feel about it.
Being white is much like being upperclass. It is being privalaged in most areas of life in the United States. And with privalage comes responsibility, and with responsibility comes guilt. The upperclass of America have to face the fact that there are a lot of people who have less than they do, yet at the same time it is hard for them not to be proud of their accomplishments. This is how I feel about being white. I know that I am privalaged for no good reason, and that there are many people who get treated like less because they aren't white. However, I find it hard to not to be proud of who I am and to enjoy my herritage just like anyone else. And I don't think I should have to.
I am mixed up about my ethnicity as I think many other white people are. There is still a lot of growing that our culture needs to do before we can put race aside. Perhaps that day will never fully come. All I can do is enjoy who I am while also being sympathetic to others, and hope for the best.

Blog Assignment for Traffic

This post is due by Friday, March 5.
Cite an argument for and against the federal legalization of marajuana for medical use.
After you have cited the two arguments, give your own opinion on the issue (250 words)

Brokeback Mountain Post

It is apparent that both Gyllenhaal and Ledger felt uncomfortable playing gay characters. I think that their both playing extremely masculine roles around the time of the release of Brokeback Mountain shows their attempt to defer any accusations of them being homosexuals. I do not know that I would go so far as to say that Ledger’s affair with his co-star was a deliberate act to “prove” to the world that he was not gay, but I’m sure that he did not put up a fight when the press covered the story.

As for my thoughts on their actions, I do not think it was necessary for them to defend their actions. I do not find their sexual orientation relevant to my respect for them as actors. In fact, I almost respect them more knowing that they are such versatile actors. I find it upsetting that both Gyllenhaal and Ledger even felt the need to defend their actions, but I understand why they did so.

Mardi Gras Post-Rabbit Proof Fence

In my opinion, I think that Rabbit Proof Fence would be an excellent movie for us to watch for class. The movie deals with the true story of three, young aborigines girls who were taken to Moorehouse Settlement. The movie took place in Australia in 1931 during the struggle between the white Christian missionaries and the indigenous peoples of Australia, the aborigines. In the film, a white man by the name of Mr. Neville enacted a plan to ultimately destroy the “unwanted” third race of half-caste children. Half-castes were the children of a mix of white and aborigines people. He got the legal rights to all of the children, stripped them from their parents, and took them to a settlement where they were trained in how to be domestic servants to white people. The three girls run away from the camp and walk over 1500 miles in a 9 week period back to their home in Jigalong.

I think that the film would benefit our class discussions because it deals with a different type of racism. In the film, Mr. Neville ACTUALLY believes that he is helping the aborigines people, and they are treated arguably well in the settlement. There are numerous aspects of mise-en-scene that would be great for analysis as well. I found the film interesting because there was little to no dialogue, but it was still extremely thought provoking.

http://www.ericdsnider.com/movies/rabbit-proof-fence/

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Brokeback Mountain


In this day and age, the word gay has come to mean “un-cool.” To call someone gay is an insult. For some people it’s natural to say, “oh that’s so gay,” in reaction to something they don’t like. Furthermore, most straight men take it as an insult to be called gay. From personal experience I can say that to be called gay as a straight man offends his ego and threatens his sense of masculinity. For these reasons, both Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger took steps, whether consciously or unconsciously, to assert to themselves and the public that they are indeed straight. To agree to play a homosexual character in a movie is a courageous thing for a man to do. However, it was apparent that even Gyllenhaal and Ledger were both slightly uncomfortable with their roles and felt the need to reassure themselves. Ledger’s filming of Casanova at the same time as Brokeback is a significant point. Casanova, which is about the escapades of a cheating, womanizing married man in eighteenth century England, is conveniently almost the exact opposite of Brokeback. Plus, if that wasn’t enough, Ledger thought it necessary to have an affair with his female co-star. In Gyllenhaal’s case, he was filming Jarhead, which focuses on a United States Marine in Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War. Not only is this “masculine” image of a marine the opposite of a gay cowboy, but the military’s policy on homosexuals is no secret.

Mardi Gras Post


The film Crash (directed by Paul Haggis) would be an excellent addition to this class’s curriculum of movies. This movie deals with all the prevalent issues of our history, present, and future as human beings. Crash tackles the topics of racism, violence, prejudice, stereotypes, social class, and ethics. This movie takes a refreshing approach to storytelling by focusing on not just one or two main characters, but about ten main characters. In the beginning, each character’s life seems to be completely unrelated to each of the other characters’ lives. However, as the movie progresses and the characters cross paths, all the storylines intervene with one another in a very artistic and unpredictable, but realistic way. Every character affects every other character even if they don’t come into direct contact with one another. Crash can also reveal things about ourselves as we each relate to one of the characters in the movie. Furthermore, since the spectrum of main characters is so diverse, almost everybody can relate to at least one of the characters. This movie would foster many a discussion in class and allow for numerous topics for writings and response papers. In the end, Crash’s message is: don’t assume you know another person just by what they look like. At the same time, this movie shows that people are inherently good and despite their prejudices, they can change.

Whiteness

Whiteness means different things to different people. Depending on a person's perspective, white may have negative or positive connotations. To minorities, "white people" might be synonymous with "oppressors." Throughout history, the white man has traveled the globe invading, intervening, and imposing his culture upon others. Weather it's the eastern world's gradual eradication and assimilation of the Native Americans, the United State’s capturing of Africans to be used as slaves, the KKK’s reign of fear and terror over Blacks, or even Hitler’s attempt to rid the world of all races not Arian, history has shown that the white man can be devastating. However, from a white man’s perspective, to be white has a whole range of different meanings. To be white means to be the best, to expand, to explore, to “pursue happiness”, to separate the good from the bad, to advance, and to look to the future. However, these goals often implore white people to step on others to achieve them. Both of these perspectives of one culture influence my own opinion of what it means to be white. When I think about what it means to be white, I often think of the stereotypes like, “white men can’t dance,” or “white men can’t jump,” or even, “white men have no rhythm.” However, I often think of negative connotations like pretentious, elitist, and selfish. Further still, I also think of words like responsibility. As a member of the infinitesimal percentage of privileged people in the world, I see whiteness as a sort of responsibility to aid others who are not as fortunate as I.

Brokeback Mountain

Brokeback Mountain had a interesting amount of social ramifications on both Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger. The amount of political pressure that this film placed on its main actors influenced the personal and professional lives in very notable ways. Both Gyllenhaal and Ledger both choose roles alongside this film that would both exhibit and reaffirm their masculinity. In "Jarhead" Gyllenhaal plays the the epitome of the manly soldier bent on tracking and killing his enemy, what better way to state to the world that you are most certainly "not gay". Heath Ledgers choice of Casanova, just read the synopsis of the film and it will be painfully clear the three sixty he takes from "Brokeback Mountain". Both men avidly defend their sexuality in all interviews that take place during and after the film.

Health Ledger's affair during its filming (and his lack of discretion) could be seen by many as a unconscious attempt to reaffirm to the public 100% that he is not gay. The actions and reactions from both actors stem from a fear of being labeled by society as homosexual. Why is this fear so intense in these successful and accomplished individuals? This is the question we should ask ourselves, have really made it such a taboo in modern America to be homosexual?

Blog Assignment: Traffic

You must answer this blog before Friday, March 5.
Cite an argument for and against federal legalization of marajuana for medical use.
After you have cited the two arguments, cite your own opinion. (250 words)

Brokeback Mountain


In Brokeback Mountain Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal play gay men. However in both their personal lives and through the other roles they accepted in film, they asserted their own straightness. Each of them took certain steps to distance themselves from the characters they played. In modern society today there is a certain stigma associated with being gay. Being gay is frowned upon in much of today's culture, it is considered by some to be backwards and subversive. Ledger and Gyllenhaal did not want to be labeled, both personally and within the film industry, as something they are not. While filming Brokeback Mountain, both actors also were fiming movies in which they played particularly masculine characters. Ledger starred in Casanova, in which he plays a man infamous for his promiscuity and womanizing. Similarly, Gyllenhaal starred in Jarhead, in which he play a marine in operation desert storm. This is a reflection of the actors fear of being typecast into gay roles. Also, during and after the filming of Brokeback Mountain both men asserted several times in interviews that they were straight. It is telling that even though they play gay characters they are both afraid of being labeled as homosexuals.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Brokeback Mountain: Jake and Heath


I definitely do not think that Jake chose the role in Jarhead based on any feelings that he had to prove his masculinity after Brokeback Mountain. I think that Jake chose the role in Jarhead for the same reason he chose the role in Brokeback Mountain: the film had a meaningful message expressed through an excellent storyline. Heath probably chose the role for Casanova because the film was big budget and based on a historical legend. Again, I do not think that either of these actors chose these uber-masculine roles based on a need to prove their own masculinity after filming Brokeback Mountain.

These heartthrob actors would not have agreed to be in an independent film about two bisexual men if they felt it would taint their masculinity in any way. So many famous actors turned down roles in BM for that very reason, like Mark Wahlberg Joaquin Phoenix, and Matt Damon.

Regarding Jake’s assertions about not being gay, I don’t think there is any thing wrong with him correcting any such rumors. Again, if he felt any discomfort about being associated with homosexuality/bisexuality he would not have taken the role in the first place.

Regarding the fact that Heath Ledger had an affair with Michelle Williams on set, maybe they just fell in love. It would be jumping to conclusions to assume that the started seeing her just so he could prove how straight he was.

Brokeback Mountain



The fact that each of these men chose to play such vastly different characters speaks volumes about their level of security. The characters Gyllenhaal plays in Brokeback Mountain and Jarhead coul hardly be any more different. If anything, the roles aside from Brokeback Mountain that these two men played probably allowed them to more accurately portray a gay man in society because after playing such assertive characters, the contrast of a man scared about the consequences his true feelings may bring would bring out the caution of the actors. However, the contrast of these roles probably also allowed the actors to potray the roles more intamately without having to worry about the perception in the public eye. It would be far easier for Gyllenhaal to convince the public that he is not gay after shooting a film like Jarhead in addition to Brokeback Mountain moreso than if he had only starred in the latter.

Brokeback Mountain

I think that Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger wanted to portray the message of Brokeback Mountain and were open to the idea of playing homosexual characters (although Ennis and Jack state they aren't "queer") but were not necessarily comfortable with their masculinity during and after the film was shot. They were obviously willing to play these parts since they read the scripts and accepted the job, but it seems as though they had to overcompensate with their other actions while filming for their own comfort and confidence. For Gyllenhaal, playing a beefed up marine in the Gulf War probably made him feel a lot better about filming intimate scenes with Ledger. Similarly, Ledger most likely felt a lot more comfortable about his sexuality (heterosexuality, to be specific) on-screen because he was having an affair off-screen. These actors probably chose these roles on purpose, but the interesting aspect about it is that all of these characters deal with the struggle of a man in every sense of the word. Rarely in these movies do the male characters interact on a full level of understanding with the female characters. So even though Brokeback strongly contrasts the other two films, they still seem to have a subtle unifying element.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Brokeback Mountain Plus Some


Jake Gullenhaal had to play a homosexual cowboy and an army member between his two movies, Brokeback Mountain and Jarhead. I find this somewhat ironic because he plays a gay man, and homosexuality and military are two things that do not mix, even today. Jake Gullenhaal is not gay, although he was questioned quite a bit after his performance. There is a political parallel and irony that can be found in his two very different roles.

Health Ledger stars is Brokeback Mountain as well as Casanova. In Brokeback Mountain he is also a homosexual cowboy. In Casanova, he is a feminist cheating married man. Although his characters are somewhat different, the actions of the characters are not all that dissimilar. In both films, Health Ledger is having an affair. Also, in real life, health Ledger also has an affair with one of his co-stars, only to lead people to find more similarities in the 2 movies and his actual life. However, in Casanova, his character he plays the stereotypical masculine role. In Brokeback mountain, his role is somewhat the opposite. And in his actual personal life, based on his actions, one could question whether his affair had anything to do with him avoiding speculation of whether or not he was gay, the way Jake had been.

These two actors must be applauded for their performances, especially ones that call them to play such different roles at the same time. I think it is just a testimate of how great of actors they are. However, they are only human, and it seems as though there is indeed a level of discomfort to playing a homosexual in a film.

Brokeback Mountain...


Jarhead takes place in the late 1980s. It is about Anthony Swofford, Jake Gyllenhaal, who becomes a sniper during the Gulf War. He is sent to Saudi Arabia and after days and days of boredom and heat Desert Strom takes place. This exposes Anthony Swofford to actual war. He sees dead bodies, burned bodies, and he gets a chance to do some killing himself. While Jarhead is about a young mans journey through war Brokeback Mountain is about two young mans journey through abnormal love. Ironically Casanova is a love story as well. Casanova, Heath Ledger, is in love with his friend Francesca. Although he is in love with some one else he is engaged to Victoria who is in love with Francesca’s brother. Throughout the love triangle and secrecy Casanova is brought by the Catholic Church to be trial for being an unorthodox catholic.  Although a love story Casanova is nothing like the love story of Brokeback Mountain. Both Jarhead and Casanova show the struggle of manly men. Ones that go to war, have a healthy and wild sex life, and are just the epitome of men. Even though Cowboys are very manly being a homosexual usually is associated with being very feminine. Viewers can tell that Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger were a little uncomfortable in their characters because of the social life they took apart of during the filming of Brokeback Mountain. Jake Gyllenhaal continuously reinforced that we was not gay while Heath Ledger had an affair with a women from the film. This does not mean they are uncomfortable with the lifestyles of homosexual, I think it just means they do not want to be taken away from their manly persona. 

Mardi Gras Movie Post


Shutter Island was released this month staring Leonardo DiCaprios and Mark Ruffalo. It is based in the 1950s, a decade in which ignorance was still bliss. Teddy Daniels, DiCaprios’ character is a U.S. marshal that is given the assignment of investigated a patient that disappeared on Shutter Island, a hospital for mentally unstable people. As the plot twists Teddy Daniels questions his reasoning for actually being sent to the island.  A hurricane hit the island keeping him on the island and enables to contact the mainland. More danger hits Teddy Daniels confusing him and leading him to doubt everything.  He thinks he is by himself and no one is trustworthy. While on the journey of Shutter Island Teddy Daniels has flashbacks of the holocaust and pictures the war he went through. Not only does the movie allude to the holocaust but it also shows the ignorance people had in the 50s when treating mentally ill patients. The island was made to give the patients a home where they could be treated and hopefully saved with out being put under surgery. I think this movie should be shown in the class politics and reel life because it gives an issue that usually isn’t brought up in the cinema. Mental illness affects a huge percentage of people in today’s world. There isn’t a lot of awareness on the subject though. I think with our new technology there should be less ignorance on the subject.  Also there is a lot of discrimination with the mentally ill. Usually if there is a movie on those who are abnormal it is a comedy and it makes fun of the struggles they have. Shutter Island shows how they were treated and still are treated; it also gives an idea to how the mentally ill see the world. 

Mardi Gras Post


The film "ShawShank Redemption" is a powerful and moving film about a man wrongfully convicted of a murder crime. This movie is thematically rich and a remarkable depiction of a man in a hopeless situation who patiently found his way to redemption and justice. This film was nominated for seven different Academy Awards, and its no wonder. Not only is their outstanding cinematography, but also the cast members bring to life complex and real characters. I think it is worth watching because of the movies representation of corruption, brutality, friendship and of course, redemption.

The main character Andy Dufrene was sentenced to life in prison, (guilty until proven innocent) for murdering his wife's lover. However, the middle of the movie, the audience is revealed information from some of the inmates, that it was actually another man who committed this crime. In order to keep Andy in jail to manage their money and oversee their illegal smuggling inmates and the ward killed the man who could prove his innocence. Andy's refusal to take part in their illegal activity resulted in months of solitude, and repeated beatings. After years of this, a gang rape, and after finding lifelong friends, Andy outdid all of them, achieving his freedom and their arrests. This movie addresses things that today still occur, that our legal system has yet to fix and our prisons still allow or ignore such activities.

Not only that, but the symbolism that occurs, for example, water plays an important role. When he first becomes free, he is in a river and it is raining. Also the last scene of the movie is a scene placed on the ocean. Water (especially in this movie) represents rebirth. It is an incredible movie that addresses important issues, and strikes an individual with its many meanings.

white

what is whiteness?Add Image

            The Caucasian race holds the title of  “whiteness.” In today's society whiteness is used to label the "superior race." Through history white people have held the idea of race against everyone else in society. It has caused riots, wars, death and injuries. Because the white race created racism they have full responsibility of the issues and stigma, which follow it. This means they are held responsible for the privileges taken away from everyone else. They are held accountable for the discrimination the minorities go through everyday in all instances. Whiteness practices the white privileges leading them to be the superior race. Whiteness holds social, political, and cultural advantages in society. For those who are white they aren't aware of the advantages but for the surrounding races it is so blatantly obvious. But at the same time there is no changing it. Although race continues to be less of a factor of society the whiteness is still very apparent. Sadly, I think it will take years to fully erase racism.  It does not help that in the cinema movies are labeled by the race of their main character.  In movies that are staring African American who are a superhero it will be known as the black superhero movie. That shows whiteness has become the norm for literally everything. Now a day in TV shows and in movies there is at least one minority race in the group of friends, in the office, in the restaurant, etc. There have even been phrases now made up for those minorities such as the token black guy. All of these aspects contribute to the superior concept of whiteness. If it were not so taboo for there to be a white main character there would not be a need for all of the race controversy that follows the cinema. Whiteness is an adjective that holds a lot of meaning in today’s society, although it has changed over the years it has yet to be erased. 


Q:In 2005, when Heath Ledger was filming Brokeback, he also filmed Casanova. Jake Gyllenhaal filmed Jarhead at the same time he filmed Brokeback. What do you think about the contrast between Brokeback and the other two films the actors chose to star in. Gyllenhaal asserted several times while filming Brokeback that he wasn't Gay, and Ledger had an affair with his co-star, his wife in the film. What do the films and the other actions of the two stars say about their comfort with playing gay characters?

The contrast between Ledger and Gyllenhaal's prior roles and their respective roles in Brokeback shows both actors's versatility and adherence to their characters. From the description given, Casanova seemed to be a much more interpersonal film than Jarhead, as Ledger ended up having an affair with his on-screen wife, whereas there was no real-life "Pvt. Jake Gyllenhall" as a result of Jarhead.

Also, Ennis is far more secretive about his sexuality than Jack, who ends up being murdered as a result. Ironic that Jack was blatantly gay, as Gyllenhall's prior role was a Marine (before the enactment of DADT). Of course, Ledger's penultimate role was The Joker in The Dark Knight, so does that mean Ledger had to deny being a sociopathic terrorist in real life? Of course not. So why should he have to deny being straight when he portrays a gay man

Brokeback Mountain Post

I think that Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger probably enjoyed doing both movies at the same time. Jake was filming Brokeback and Jarhead at the same time and Health was filming Brokeback and Casanova at the same time. These movies are very different and I believe that the actors enjoyed the difference. Actors are trained and schooled to play different parts. Jake and Health are both very good actors and I think that they would have enjoyed putting the pressure on them to fulfill both parts.

In Jake’s case, I am sure it was hard playing a gay cowboy and an army man. I think that is very ironic because gays and the military are two things that are very controversial with each other. I do not blame Jake for saying many times that he was not gay. When filming a movie that you are playing a gay man in then many people think that that actor probably is gay. It is sad that Americans would think that today. I do not think that Jake had to tell our nation the things he did but that’s just the way it is.

Health had an affair with a co-star. I do not think this is good but I cannot make anyone do anything. Being married and having an affair with another person is very wrong. I think that Health was wrong in this.

The two must have definitely been comfortable playing the gay roles in this movie. If they were not I do not think they would have dealt with it. I do not think they are gay but they definitely did not have a problem playing gay characters.

Brokeback Mountain


Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger show a lot of courage for starring in a film such as Brokeback Mountain. Also, filming movies such as Jarhead and Casanova at the same time shows their diverse abilities as actors. The contrast between Brokeback Mountain and Jarhead is quite large. Jarhead is a war drama, and homosexuality in the army is a very touchy issue. The two different characters that Jake Gyllenhaal plays are the complete opposites. To me, that shows an extremely strong characteristic of an actor and his personal stance on the issue. Gyllenhall stated many times that he was not gay, and he still portrayed a gay man in a movie. Heath Ledger even had an affair with his co-star (a woman.) I think that heterosexual males portraying homosexuals teaches a lesson to everyone that watches it. Homosexuality is not a problem, and it shouldn’t be a taboo subject.

Ledger and Gyllenhaal are obviously very comfortable with playing homosexual characters. I’m sure any Hollywood actor or actress would be. They have the ability to teach this message to everyone by portraying gay characters.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Mardi Gras Post: Dr. Strangelove


One movie I was supprised to see see not a part of this course was "Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb." This movie, set in the Cold War, is considered one of the greatest political satires of all time and is ranked #30 on IMDB's list of the 250 greatest movies.

In the movie, the commander of an American Air Force base orders nuclear armed bombers to attack various strategic Russian locations. The pentagon scrambles to call back all of the planes and prevent nuclear war with Russia. Meanwhile, we learn that Russia has recently created a "Doomsday Machine" which will set off all of Russia's nuclear arsenal(essentially destroying much of the world). Eventually one of the bombers reaches its destination, and the doomsday device is activated. The main point the movie is trying to convey is that there is no winner to nuclear war. Russia's creation of a doomsday device is no different than world superpowers stockpiling nuclear arms, it can only end in eventual destruction.

What makes this film so great is that its not just a political film, its also an excellent comedy. The satire and black comedy in the the movie help to present the movies message in a more entertaining and effective way.

Mardi Gras Post: Shutter Island


This past Friday, Shutter Island premiered starring Leonardo DiCaprio. The film would make a great addition to the curriculum. It is a very dark film, and the plot is not easily picked up. I’m not trying to say that is what makes a good film, but it definitely kept me entertained. I’m going to try to do this without revealing the plot to all of those who have not seen it yet. The film is about two federal marshals who are sent to investigate an escaped prisoner on the fictional Shutter Island medical prison facility. Upon arrival, the mysterious chief psychiatrist initiates the uneasy feeling felt throughout the film. There’s an overbearing sense of conspiracy throughout the film, which was achieved in part by the very dark filming styles and the deep, bass-filled music throughout. One of the main topics of the movie, in fact, was a conspiracy theory trying to reveal what was really happening to the patients of this island. The film goes on to isolate the main marshal, Teddy Daniels (Leo DiCaprio) that furthers the feeling of insanity. This film relates to the class because conspiracy theories apply to any time period of this country in almost all aspects of the government. Another aspect of the film that would make it relevant to the class is the ending, which is highly debatable. My friends and I argued about how to interpret it throughout the whole car ride home. I feel as though this would make for a very interesting Politics in Reel life class. Thanks for listening.

mardi gras post ... shutter island


There are many films out there but I believe that Shutter Island would make a great addition to the current movie list. Shutter Island is about a man who is sent to Shutter Island to conduct an investigation on an escapee. Teddy Daniels, the main character, is joined at the beginning of the movie by Chuck Aule who becomes his partner through the investigation. When the two get to the island they start out by asking around for information, but suddenly they find out that people are not talking. Through very much of the movie, there are twist and turns. Teddy has flash backs of his past and gains information through them. There ends up being a terrible storm and the men get stuck there. Since the movie was just released I do not want to reveal the ending. The movie was very good and I would recommend it to anyone to go see.



Although the movie does not deal directly will politics it does bring about a good strong line and struggle. Throughout the entire movie, Teddy deals with a person versus self conflict. He has many flashbacks that mess with his mind and affect the way he thinks and acts. The mental issues Teddy goes through shape him as a person and the movie. I believe this would be a great movie to add to the class.

Mardi Gras Post


The movie Crash would be a great addition to the rotation of films for Politics and Reel Life. The film addresses various issues such as racism, violence, corruption, crime and discrimination. I would say that the main focus is race issues in Los Angeles, California. I am from San Diego, which is about an hour south of Los Angeles, and the situations portrayed in Crash are just as prevalent, if not more so, in that area especially. The movie follows several groups of characters that seem to have nothing to do with each other, but as the film progresses, they all have encounters with one another through one of the aforementioned issues. The film plays on problems of racism in white cops, discrimination against low-wage workers, and the paranoia of people that causes them to turn to violence. This film definitely has a lot in common with Good and Bowling for Columbine. It points out the “other” in a modern day society and highlights the huge, growing space between them and everyone else. All of the characters eventually face a moral dilemma, usually dealing with one of the other characters. There is a huge theme of good versus bad, and the ability of people to give benefit of the doubt to others on a daily basis. With so much prejudice and violence (especially evident in the justice system), it is difficult for people to ever truly understand each other. And therefore, they do not touch, but “crash” into each other every so often.

Sunday, February 21, 2010

"The Boondock Saints",written and directed by Troy Duffy, is one of my all time favorite movies. Two brothers go on an nearly comical vendetta through a Boston killing any and all individuals they believe are evil. The story focuses around these killings, their inspiration, and their execution as well as the detective following their actions. The brothers Conner and Murphy MacManus (Sean Patrick Flanery and Norman Reedus) play their parts well as they act as humorous angels of death. There are great political implications regarding there actions and their religious influences as devout Catholics to be discussed as a class as well. The documentary feel at the end of the movie offers a discussion topic for the class as well, as we could talk about what we would say in such an interview and discuss the different responses show by the interviewee's in the movie.



Over all this is just a great movie that students would enjoy watching while it would still provide great discussions in class.

Mardi Gras film






David Fincher's 1999 cult classic Fight Club addresses consumer culture, alienation, rebellion, and society's ideas of masculinity . Adapted from author Chuck Palahniuk's 1996 novel, Fight Club been the target of both controversy and condemnation. The story involves an unnamed Narrator (Edward Norton), sick of crunching numbers from 9-to-5 for a major car company, meets the personification of the Alpha-male, Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt). Tyler and the Narrator could not be more opposite: whereas the Narrator's salary depends on him merely doing equations, Tyler works multiple jobs and knows how to create discord at all of them (i.e. splicing frames of pornography into family films, urinating in soups served at an upscale hotel restaurant, selling soap made from human fat,etc.). However, the Narrator's life truly starts to change when Tyler creates an underground fight club, putting him in the middle of

A major part of both the book and film involves the link between masculinity and consumerism. Tyler believes that because Generation X has not really had a defining culture or war, its members have become apathetic, always following the latest trends and fads in order to achieve some form of "happiness". The lack of a defining figure also applies to men; since many members of the titular fight club were raised by single mothers, they lacked a father figure to guide them and teach them life lessons. As a result, they end up trying to fill that void by spending their money on essentially worthless material. But when Tyler starts up the fight club, these men now have a motivation to work out and live better.

Interestingly enough, Norton also portrayed nebbish scientist Bruce Banner in Zak Penn's 2008 film, The Incredible Hulk; in interviews, Penn has noted the similarities between the raging, savage green Hulk and the pure id of Tyler Durden.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Mardi Gras Film

Stanley Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange is still as relevant today as when it was released in 1971. The film touches on ethical, political, and other philosophical themes all while providing the viewer with a beautiful visual spectacle, which makes it one of the greatest and most original films of all time. The film centers on Alex Delarge, who is a troubled youth who frequently commits acts of violence and rape purely for fun. Once Alex murders a woman, he is given a new treatment administered by the government. The Ludivigo treatment, as it is called in the film, makes it physically impossible for the patient to commit the acts that he is treated for, which causes a huge debate between the government and the church. The ultimate questioned presented by this is: is one truly acting morally if he has no option to do otherwise (freewill)? The film also portrays the government as valuing favor in the public eye over truly caring for the well being of its citizens. This film is nearly impossible to summarize in under 250 words, but it is definitely a film that everybody needs to see (if not multiple times in order to pick up every subtlety Kubrick presents). Not only is the film visually one of the best in the history of film, but the thematic elements shown in the film are some of the most important of our time.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Brokeback Mountain Post

The main characters in Brokeback Mountain, Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal, play roles as two young men who develop a sexual relationship with each other. Heath Ledger also plays in Casanovo as a man who is having an affair, and is said to be much of a feminist. Jake Gyllenhaal played a role as a Marine in the film Jarhead. The two roles Heath and Jake both play in their other films are stereoytpical manly ones, but their roles in Broekback Mountain are the opposite. In Brokeback Mountain, they are playing roles that are portrayed as not so manly because they are acting as homosexuals; many see same-sex relationships as wrong, and that men and women are only to be sexual with one another, that is why the characters in Brokeback Mountain felt they had to secretly go about the way that they felt because they would be shamed and embarrassed if people knew that they were homosexuals. While filming Brokeback Mountain, Heath Ledger had an affair with the women who played his wife in the actual movie, and Jake Gyllenhaal made it a point to clearly and repeadetly state that he was not actually a homosexual and was just playing one for the film. Since the roles Jake and Heath played in Broekback Mountain were gay characters, their actions outside of the film seem to say that neither of them are very comfortable with playing these roles, and they do not want people to think that they are homosexual in real life, so they felt the need to prove it in some way or another. The roles from their other movies also show that they want to be portrayed as "manly men", and do not want the public to get the wrong picture because if they were seen as gay, accidentially or purposefully, it would bring on bad publicity and nasty rumors.

The reason why many people are so afraid to let out their true sexuality is because we live in such a judgemental world. Just as Jake did not want people to think that he was actually gay, even if he might be or not, he was afraid that he was going to be judged differently. Both him and Heath still took on a lot of heat by having roles in Brokeback Mountain because no matter what actions they took outside the film, their theatrical cahracters would still bring rumors and judgement into the real world. Many are outcasted if seen as gay because most of society was brought up to believe that homosexuality is a sin or it is not the way things are supposed to be. Gays are not able to be enlisted in the military (or if they are found out to be gay), gays are not able to get legally married in most states, gays are shunned or looked down upon as a human malfunction or something of the sort, which all of thsese things is incredibly wrong to pass judgement about. A person is still a person, no matter what gender, and who says that the only way things are supposed to be are oppisite sex relationships? NOBODY Because who says those people are right? ...



Discrimination has taken over. Poeple find anything to discriminate against, leaving only themselves to be liked, which is stupid because everybody is different.







Thursday, February 18, 2010

Mardi Gras post




The movie "Avatar" strikes to the heart of how humans treat our planet and other people who inhabit areas of our world that contain resources we desire. While this movie does not cover new ground with its storyline, it does make use of modern technology to tell the story of the destruction of Native American tribes and of our ecosystem far better than any movie I have seen pertaining to this subject (albeit in a fantasy world). "Avatar" is visually stimulating and enthralling. The trailer is able to show the visual aspect of the film, but only touches lightly on the storyline.





"Avatar" also shows the real possibility of technology in the near future. The use of combat suits for military campaigns is not far off. The spacecraft, however, are quite far off considering our current technology. If we had spent more time focusing on the future of our species instead of the art of short term gain, we could easily have had a base on the moon and far more advanced spacecraft. Unfortunately, modern day Americans have a problem with delaying gratification unlike the generation leading up to the 1960's. The current generation of Americans would never abide budgeting billions of dollars for something they may not see come to fruition during their lifetimes.



"Avatar" would be an excellent addition to the curriculum due to its focus on human political relationships, resource management, and its real view of possible future technology; if only we could focus on something 20 years away. "Avatar" looks at the constant need of powerful groups subjugating the weak for profit. This human need for control and profit is one of the key causes of pain and death on this planet. By having "Avatar" take place on a different planet with a different native species allows us to forget our ingrained prejudices and identify with the native life. This detachment from prejudices allowed viewers to feel and understand the pain that is caused by our actions and how greedy humans really are.

Friday, February 12, 2010

Whiteness in America


Whiteness is a word that is hard to define. Whiteness in America is not just associated with the color of one’s skin but, unfortunately, with a long history of racism and prejudice. This prejudice is still present in our country today. According to the article “The Concept of Whiteness and American Film” white movie-goers tend not to see movies with non-white actors or movies that are ethnically based. The article’s author believes that people are only willing to watch movies that they can “relate” to. I personally don’t agree with that. Everyone has their own preference of what films they like and want to go see, it is not that they are prejudiced against the film. This, I feel is also true of what books and magazines we read. However, many would agree that “whiteness” sells. One magazine that has seen some racial controversy is Vanity Fair. Their upcoming March issue, which features who they call, “The New Hollywood of 2010”, has been accused of lacking diversity. While I would agree that it does lack diversity, considering it features nine white females on its cover, should it be accused of being racist or is just trying to appeal to its consumers? I am not trying to say that only white people buy Vanity Fair, because that would be unfair. But I doubt that a predominantly black magazine like Ebony would put white actresses on its cover with the idea of it selling to its intended buyers.

Mardi Gras Post

Since we will have no class this week and no film, your post for the blog should be a 200-250 word review of a movie that you think would make a good addition to this class. Convince me that I should add it to the rotation.
Post a picture or trailer from the film or a link to another review.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Blanca


White in present day is simply a stereotype. To be white means nothing more than the color of your skin and the stereotype that is attached to it. A stereotype that implies that white people are racist, corrupt, and "got no swag." Now back sometime 1780 for many whites it was more than a stereotype, it was probably true. Most whites were probably very racist and owned a few slaves to do their dirty work. Although now in the "land of the free" white can be anything we as whites portray it as. After all stereotypes don't just come out of thin air, they are derived from the history of the people being stereotyped and what was the norm for them. This stereotype also comes from a culture. The white culture listens to indie-rock, wear polo shirts, and has a steak and beer every night for dinner. Although these may be extremes from the culture they do pertain to a lot of whites in America. When I listed these traits it sounded as though I was stereotyping, even though that was my intent it shoes how people pull out what is "seen" as the norm of a culture and create a stereotype. If it angers you what connotations go along with being white, first embrace it then change it, make people look at you and go "uuu that white girls got swag."

What Is Whiteness Really?

Defining what is whiteness is a hard thing to do in a society that is so full of various races. Stereotypes for white people usually include the weatherman with the a very wide-ranged vocabulary. Comedian Dave Chappelle claimed stereotypical things a white person does is drink juice as well as not being capable of dancing. In today's society being white really means that you are limited in the jokes and lingos that other racial groups are allowed to share. A white person is immediately targeted if a thought to be racist statement is made. Most other groups have their own culture to fall back on or use amongst themselves, however white people are not allowed that luxury. The white stereotype in usually always negative, being portrayed as either rednecks or upperclass citizens that look down on all other groups besides their own who remain ignorant and choose to remain that way. Though white people are attacked for being racist the majority of the time, white people are still having to suffer to the mistake in America that was slavery, by succombing to societies views of them being racist.

"whiteness"

The term "whiteness" is just another social group. It may just be referring to the color of one's skin, but it carries a lot of baggage. To many in America, being white is commendable because they are associated within the higher-educated, higher paying, more sophisicated class, and blacks are seen to be the opposite of them. This seperation of skin color has has created stereotypes that are misleading and prejudiced. I do not follow with any of the stereotypes of blacks and whites because everyone is a human being, no matter what their skin color, and they deserve to be treated like everyone else. Since whiteness is the majority of our nation, it has put a struggle on the black race. Blacks are many times portrayed as ones who are involved in violence and crime, and the media tends to emphsize this. Which in turn, instills fear in its audiences and creates discrimination. In my opinion, just because someone has a different skin color and does not have as many people in their race, white Americans seem to think that it is alright to pass judgement and have more power and control over them.

Race: Caucasian

In 1954 Kenneth and Mamie Clark did a series of psychological experiments using dolls in an effort to make a case for desegregation of schools in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education. The study consisted of several preschooled aged children being given the choice between two identical dolls that differed in race.


The study showed that the majority of the children, specifically the majority of black children involved in the study, identified the white doll as the prettier and better than the black doll, which was seen as ugly.

The fact is that in America, white is normal. From 1949-1962 Crayola produced a crayon color called "flesh." This color resembled the skin color of white americans, Crayola changed it in 1962 to "peach," in response to the Civil Rights movement, and their aknowledgement of the fact that flesh comes in many different colors. But it remains that being white is the majority, it is the normal. White people, men specifically, are not percieved has having to "rise above" anything. White men are seen as existing without struggle.

The Kenneth and Mamie Clark experiments were re-created in 2006 by filmmaker Kiri Davis, and documented in the HBO special, A Girl Like Me. The results had not changed much.






Bibliography:
Kenneth and Mamie Clark Experiments
Crayola's Color "Flesh"

Whiteness in America


The term "whiteness" has many different connotations depending on the eye of the viewer. In America, I think many people see being white as not only a skin color, but also a certain attitude, style, and status that goes along with it. Reading the article "The Concept of Whiteness and American Film" shows how in movies, we subconsciously expect the leading roles to be played by white people, like the author suggested because that is who most Americans feel they can "relate" to. While if there is a leading role that is played by a person who is not white, the whole movie immediately changes, and many Americans whether they realize it or not, do not gravitate towards those movies as much as they would if it was played by a white actor. In the movie American History X, racism is shown towards any one who is not white, as well as not Protestant. This definition of white refers back to the WASP criteria which is, White Anglo-Saxon Protestant.
In America, there are many generalizations that pertain to people just because they are not white, which is not accurate at all. Being white does not mean you immediately are rich or hardworking or deserve something that no one else should be entitled to, which is how many Americans view being white as. In my opinion to be white means to be pale, to be of a light skin color.

Whiteness in Film


Ever since the advent of film, the screen has largely been dominated by Caucasian actors. Perhaps this is because early and even modern day film makers cater to the fact that the majority of the nation's population is white, which in turn will hopefully lead to more ticket sales. This has caused other films with actors of other ethnicities to be labled as "black" or whichever race the actors happen to be. Of course it is easier for a viewer to identify himself with the protaganist if he is of the same race, but the standard of whiteness in film, although it is on the decline since the early 20th century, has such a strong hold in the film industry that film makers almost expect every viewer to be able to relate to a caucasian actor as the standard. The trend over the last few decades in response to this is to include a token character of a different race in order to avoid the film being labeled racist, but this just confirms the notion that even film makers are aware of the white standard that is prevalent in film. Films have also created stereotypes for certain races that carried on until the end of the century. The essay listed examples such as Italian Americans who were labeled with the mobster or "Guido" stigma, and Irish Americans, who were often portrayed as unintelligent drunks. However, I believe that instead of race, economic status plays more of a role in determining what the standard for film is. Film companies target who they believe will be willing to spend the most moeney on film, and because Caucasians hold a lot of the wealth in the nation, film makers believe that they will be the most likely to buy tickets.

What "whiteness" means to me

Having grown up in idle suburbia my whole life, my view of whiteness has become rather cynical. To me, whiteness means being able to pass off as part of a majority. The term "White" has a connotation of being "unhip", "WASPy," etc. What confuses me is why some groups are excluded and why others are assimilated.
Technically, the term "Caucasian" also includes Arabs, Indians and Ashkenazi Jews. But almost none of these groups are considered "white enough," even though they have a similar ethnic background. For example, even though Governor Piyush "Bobby" Jindal is Caucasian, he is not "white," even though he fits in the same, commonly-used racial category. Also, no sensible person would make anti-Irish caricatures, but how many people would bat an eyelash at a caricatured suicide bomber.

My dad having mainly Sicilian ancestry, as a kid I had joked that he was really "black" due to his slightly darker skin tone. This may sound like inane, childish comments, but some "pro-white" groups exclude Italian-Americans primarily for that reason.

The "Whiteness and American Film" article mentions how many audiences considered the comic book and film antihero Spawn a black superhero, while not making any racial analysis of characters like Batman. In my mind, filmmakers automatically assume that middle-class, well-off white people are the target audience. Apparently, a film with a black protagonist will not be successful if producers primarily emphasize his race and cause controversy because of it. (From what I've read, Spawn's racial background have not been emphasized as often as his supernatural powers.)

What It Means To Be White

Being white means being more privileged. Throughout history, fair skin has been believed to be somehow superior and preferred to darker skin. I realize that it is only a color and a skin tone, but prejudices and stereotyped are so ingrained into our systems that we can hardly choose to ignore them. They are there whether we like them or not, and there is truth to them. When I say that being white means being more privileged, I am not necessarily referring to the idea that white people have nicer cars or bigger houses in suburbia, although that could very easily be the case. I am talking specifically about being of Caucasian decent. There are tangible inequalities between the daily life of a white person and that of any other race. For example, if taking a standardized test and asked to list ethnicity, a white person can simply choose to fill in the "Caucasian" bubble. They don't really truly have to specify what race they are, they have an option of hiding it. Anyone else, however, has to fill in the correct bubble, whether that be "Asian", "African-American", or "Hispanic". Those choices are far more specific, and therefore slightly less equal, since it is not the first, most prominent choice. If this were a dominantly black community, the choices would say "African-American" and then proceed to list something along the lines of "Irish", "English", "Italian", "Swedish", or "German" and so on and so forth. If the world weren't racist at all, all of the choices would be there and everyone would have the option of listing what ethnicity they are. This was just one example, however. These same subtle inequalities occur all the time, and very often subconsciously. As far as appearance, people can be from a wide variety of countries, but white people can hide that. They can just be white. Black people always have to be black, Asian people always have to be Asian. It all goes back to the idea of the "other" and how any variation from a White, Protestant male is automatically one of them. Perhaps I am being too harsh, but a lot of my opinion on this was realized when I read Watching The Canary in a Sociology class. It is about the subconscious expectations between races and the apparent pre-determined destiny that is self-fulfilled by each of these races.

Whiteness



To define what it means to be white only furthers a perceived difference in humans. We are all of the same race, but with diverse skin tones based on where on the planet we exist or our ancestors lived. Skin pigmentation is a result of exposure to the sun. Our body creates most if its supply of vitamin D from direct exposure to the sun. As humans migrated away from the equatorial regions of the Earth, the intensity of solar exposure declined. This diminishing exposure, coupled with the darker skin tone of our ancestors, created a vitamin D shortage. The human body reacted by decreasing the melanin levels contained in the surface of our skin, allowing more sun to penetrate our flesh. Over time, our bodies adapted to the new climates and areas in which we now exist. The new pressures placed on our bodies caused our musculature, bone structure, and skin tone to change. Tracing our human origins, we would find that all humans had dark skin. Our whiteness is merely an adaptation to the environment in which we exist.


We cannot divide ourselves into colors or tones because these colors do not define the people we are. Our skin merely defines what our bodies were exposed to over time. Using physical parameters to determine which is the better race only works through natural selection. The reason the current type of human is prevalent is because we are better suited for survival on this planet. The color of our ancestors' skin played little role in the dominance of the Homosapien. It was our sum total of collective adaptations that allowed our species to succeed.


Our stylistic and linguistic mannerisms are influenced by our cultures and locations, not skin color. Skin color is another way humans find to parse our species into several groups in order to facilitate violence or to subjugate one another. If all humans were human (without racial groups), it would be difficult to rationalize causing harm to each other; albeit we would rely on other factors such as religion or nationality.


When a shopper is interested in buying a shirt and finds two colors, one white and one black, that shopper does not simply say that one is better than the other due to its color. The shopper will consider the thread count, material, design, quality, and cut. People will always judge others; however, we should at least judge other people on their merits and character. A good person is good regardless of the color of his or her skin.




Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Whitness in America



There in a very clear divide in society between blackness and whiteness. White people subconsciously divide themselves from black people. White people see black people in many cases as outsiders. They see them as inferior to white people. Coming from a white family, I see how white people often separate themselves from blacks. Older members of my family have a fear of black people. This fear of black people is the same thing that caused white flight. Americans subconsciously divides everyone. People are given the designation of “black” or “white” and assigned the stereotypes of each. Because white people make up most of our society, the view of the “average successful American” is of a white middle-class male.